In this page, it is clearly shown that the Clerk of the Court Evidence Custodian has in his possession the evidence that was introduced at trial. Within these nine (9) pages, it is shown the victim’s alleged sheets and her black and white print dress used to wipe semen from the victim’s leg, but left behind at the crime scene by the perpetrator and later on collected by the law enforcement officers. Thus, been that the evidence exist and it is available for retesting, in addition to the the fact that Ernesto’s pro bono DNA Consultant Tiffany Roy is welcome to review and retest the evidence containing DNA in this case, at no cost to the State of Florida, it seems manifestly injustice not to allow Ernesto to perform the necessary testing that could free him from this crime. Every single Court that has reviewed his petition for retesting has been vigorously denying relief.
Equally unjustified, is that the fingerprints and palm prints collected at the point of entry and exit of this crime scene, although available within the Clerk of Court’s Evidence Vault, are not being reanalyzed to confirm whom they belong to? This way, pointing out the actual perpetrator of this crime.
